Section 497 Determination Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 337 H (ii), 147, 148 and 149 Qatal Ahmed bail, denied the prosecution's testimony, which was available at the time of the incident, to the accused in the identification of the crime. Was completely involved. The suspect was shown in the light, but it was not mentioned whether it was a torch light or the suspect in the light of the light, escaped after the incident and escaped and did not appear to the investigating officer during the investigation. The accused, who was fugitive for a period of one year and eight months, was also involved in another criminal case under Sections 9595, 3, 353, 4 324, PPC and in this case Kalashnikov was also recovered, the name of the accused F. Appeared in the IR, where he was assigned a specific role, he was alleged to be a relative of the complaining party. The identity of the accused in the FIR was not suspected, the blood-stained land and 20 Kalashnikov vacancies have been recovered, which was confirmed in a post-mortem report of four eyewitnesses who testified that the death of the deceased was a fireworks. , Who also supported the version of the ocular evidence, because the accused, along with the other co-accused, was also involved in the double murder case, not eligible for any exception to the bail. Unable to present a case for further investigation, his bail plea was dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
