Section 302 (b) Code of Criminal Procedure 4 (V of 1898), Article 4040 Q Legal evidence (of 1984 of the ten), Article 333 Qatil Ahmed prosecuting prosecution for witnesses engage in public expenditure for cross-examination of prosecution witnesses , Under the provisions of section 4040 of, the CCP granted powers to the court to summon or revoke any witnesses, if it was necessary for a fair decision in section 540 of the case, to the PC Was divided into two parts. One where the court had the discretion to ask for a court witness himself or upon request. And the other part was that the court was mandated to do so. The basic prerequisite for the use of compulsory duty was the satisfaction of the court that the evidence of the witness was necessary for the decision of this case, not the trial court in the present case. There is no difficulty in engaging a lawyer who is able to examine witnesses on public expenditures because the death sentence was pronounced in this case; By a lawyer, if the private lawyer didn't come forward. The trial court was obliged to include a senior lawyer on state expenditures to examine the witnesses, so that the accused should be allowed to present his case before the trial court, which pertains to the trial case. The case was sentenced. The court was set aside and the trial was remanded in the trial court to give the accused a chance to stand trial so that he could defend himself in the case. If the accused is not busy, a senior lawyer of Omar will go to trial. The court was directed to pay the state expenses
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
