Find a Lawyer

GHULAM SHABIR versus STATE

Attempts to compile Section 497 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 353, 148 and 149 of Kital Ahmed, the FIR's denial, revealed that the names of the accused appeared in the FIR. Armed and one was recovered. They were affected by the buffaloes The accused was involved in four other cases and these cases were also disclosed in the trial court FIR against them that 12 bore guns were recovered from the scene of the incident. No bail plea in case of further inquiry, he was dismissed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD HANIF S. KALIA v. State 2010 YLR 1822
• KHAIR MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 MLD 1827
• Mir FAYAZ AHMED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1832
• MURTAZA v. State 2010 MLD 1836
• PAKISTAN STATE OIL COMPANY LIMITED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF WORKS, through Secretary 2010 CLC 1843
• GHULAM HUSSAIN v. State 2010 MLD 1846
• TANVEER SIDDIQUI v. MUHAMMAD RASHID 2010 YLR 1851
• NAJEEB ULLAH v. State 2010 MLD 1860

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

family advocate from Piplan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes