MUHAMMAD ALAM versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY
Plaintiff's shop allotment in the market by a general order under Articles 39, 42, 54, and 55 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OI, R-10 suit, revocation of orders, mandatory and permanent injunction Be done Applicants by interlocutor / allottee to restrain the authority from making such order illegal under the Relief and canceling it, leasing the suit to the direct authority, and preventing the plaintiff from suing. May be requested to join as the claimant for the claimant. After the steel order was issued in favor of the claimant, some people threatened to expel the shop in such market. In no way was an improper order issued to any person, but it was also a general order to cancel the allotment of shops. The interventionist's allotment letters were also issued during the ban by unauthorized officials and in violation of the decision of the provincial Ombudsman. Sanctions Period The plaintiff and the defendant's allotment letters fall within the scope of the cancellation orders and unless in each individual case the order is specified by court order, the restriction order The same will apply to all occupants receiving an allotment during the term. The beneficiary will have the benefit of interfering with the defendant's position as defendant, since it cannot be provided merely in the capacity of the defendant to interfere with such request and Nor can it be allowed, so m
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
