Find a Lawyer

WAHEEDULLAH versus STATE

An attempt to compel Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Qatal Ahmed bail, the complainant's grant of further investigation had named four persons in his statement after the incident, but his He later acquitted the three accused. The case was not investigated, both the prosecution witnesses were policemen

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• ASHIQUE v. State 2010 MLD 1699
• HAMID v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1700
• SUPREME TUBE INDUSTRIES, KARACHI v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, (ADJUDICATION-I) 2010 PTD 1703
• MUHAMMAD AYUB SHAIKH v. CANTONMENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2010 YLR 1703
• MEHAR ALI v. CHAKAR 2010 YLR 1707
• MUHAMMAD ALAM v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary 2010 CLC 1708
• MUHAMMAD HANIF alias TANGO v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1715
• ALI RAZA v. State 2010 YLR 1716

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Sehwan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes