Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, MULTAN ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD.


West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 15 (4) The authority to dismiss or deport an illegal person during an unlawful domestic inquiry inquiry should be reviewed in such inquiry. The named defendant is considered to have acted unfairly against the person and employee in the counter case in connection with the same incident, and that the inquiry report's action was based on prejudice based on prejudice; therefore, the law Carrying on the look, based on such inquiry reports Weight, including suspension order. Service Provided

1979 P L C 69

[National Industrial Relations Commission]

Present : Ataullah Sajjad, Chairman

NAZAR MUHAMMAD

versus

MANAGING DIRECTOR, MULTAN ELECTRIC SUPPLY Co. LTD.

.Case No. 18(7) of 1978, decided on 12th June 1978.

(a) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordi nance (VI of 1968)‑

‑ S. O. 15(4)‑Misconduct‑‑Domestic enquiry‑Power of dismissal or expulsion operating to disadvantage of person arraigned at enquiry‑ Principles of natural justice to be observed in such enquiry- Enquiry Officer named as an accused person in counter case regis tered in respect of same incident and presumed to be biased against employee proceeded against‑Enquiry report drawn on basis of enquiry vitiated by bias and, therefore, nullity in eyes of law‑Held, proceedings based on such enquiry report including order of termi nation of service rendered nugatory.

In re : General Manager, Heavy Mechanical Complex, Taxila 1977 P L C 532 ; Zafarul Ahsan v. The Republic of Pakistan P L D 1960 S C 113 ; Mehr Din v. The Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner, Lahore P L D 1974 S C 193 ; S. Viqar Ahmad Burni, Accounts Assistant, Multan v. Managing Director, Multan Electric Supply Co. Ltd., Multan Case No. 22(1) of 1977 and M. U. A. Khan v. Rana M. Sultan and other P L D 1974 S C 228 ref.

(b) Interpretation of statutes‑

‑‑‑ Repeal‑Not to be readily inferred by implication‑Repeal by implication can take place only in case of impossibility of reconcilia tion between two statutes.

(c) Pakistan Essentials Services (Maintenance) Act (LIII of 1952)‑‑

‑ Ss. 6 & 7‑A‑Provisions of Act do not come into clash with provi sions of Economic Reforms Order (1 of 1972).

Aqa Asaf Jaffery for Petitioner.

Abdul Rashid, Assistant Labour Officer (Legal) with Abdul Khaliq Khan for Respondent.

Date of bearing : 30th July 1978.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates from Kot Bunglow lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.