MUHAMMAD ASIF SIDDIQUI versus PAK ARAB REFINERY LTD., KARACHI

Section 6 of Pakistan Compulsory Services (Rehabilitation) Act 1952 can deal with the jurisdiction of a person belonging to a salary or class of persons covered under the Act in terms of their wages and terms and conditions of service. Do Priority is given again

1979 P L C 529

[National Industrial Relations Commission]

Present : S. Rais Ahmad Jafri, Member

MUHAMMAD ASIF SIDDIQUI

versus

PAK ARAB REFINERY LTD., KARACHI

Case No. 18 (41) of 1978, decided on 31st March, 1979.

(a) Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act (VIII of 1952)‑

‑‑ S. 5(1), Explanation‑Termination of service‑Excuse for‑Must be reasonable‑Merely stating that services no longer required‑Not enough compliance of S. 5(1) ‑Such termination, held, liable to be set aside.

(b) Pakistan Essential Services (Maintenance) Act (VIII of 1952)‑

‑‑ S. 6‑Specified Authority‑Jurisdiction‑Can deal with cases of individuals or class of persons belonging to establishment covered by the Act in respect of their wages and terms and con ditions of service‑Unjustified and illegal termination of service- Can be challenged before specified Authority to seek re‑instatement.

Burmah‑Shell Employees' Union v. Burmah‑Shell Ltd. 1978 L S L R 69 rel.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

list of supreme court advocates from Saidu Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes

👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team