After the deposition of Section 302/34 Criminal Code (v. 1898), the testimony of Section 417 prosecutors, the appeal against the evil killer revealed that the complainant and the witnesses did not allege in their evidence that any of the accused Has suffered some kind of injury. According to the FIR, the accused were armed with pistols and poles, but the complainant stated in his statement that he was empty-handed at the time of the incident when eyewitnesses said that police had obtained his signature. Did not Neither the papers nor his statement were recorded, evidence of the other prosecutor's testimony was on the same line. The witness, in several investigations, stated that the police did not record his statement, but obtained his signature on the blank paper at the hospital. Such an admission by the prosecution's witnesses led to the eyewitness testimony of the incident, and the complainant's contradictory version, leading the prosecutor to prove his case against the accused by the trial court. No, the circumstances were for good and reasonable reasons and no error was found in the unknown order. And to deal with appeals against conviction, the approach will be different and they should be set aside. Against being evil, because the charge of dual innocence was linked to the acquittal, the prosecutor could not produce concrete evidence, which could add the accused to the charges against the accused, who killed the other accomplices. Of the murder, did not appeal because it was alleged that the accused was armed with a weapon and he was on the commission of the crime.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
