Find a Lawyer

AZEEM-USH-SHAN-E-HAIDER versus STATE

The trial court dismissed the powers granted by the trial court under sections S61A and 249A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), section 448/457/149/427/337A (i) section 249A, CR PC. Filed against. Although APG was verbally consent to approve the application under Section 249A, CCPC, the trial court legally ignored the exception and, with the approval of the parties' advice, The High Court ruled that no private prosecutor would take action on behalf of her complainant. But he could only assist in litigation in the presence of the DDA Trial Court

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• TASLEEM AKHTER v. PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 795
• GULZAR AHMED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 800
• AMIR FEROZ v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 2010 CLD 802
• DIGITAL WORLD PAKISTAN (PVT.) Ltd. v. SAMSUNG GULF ELECTRONICS FZE through Managing Director 2010 CLD 804
• COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, KARACHI v. PAKISTAN STATE OIL CO. LTD., KARACHI 2010 PTD 808
• ALI ASGHAR v. State 2010 MLD 810
• SABIR HUSSAIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 810
• YAR MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 YLR 814

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

top civil advocates from Kumbh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes