Find a Lawyer

AMIR FEROZ versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Article 199 Constitution Credit Card Facility The applicant's failure to repay the credit card facilitator's payment to the bank was partly due to payment, but the bank was ineligible for the circumstances. Could not refund balance due to staff. Applicants and their families were pressured to overlook the provisions of the Banking Law Council for Banks Bank for the refund of the outstanding balance on credit card facility that the bank had a forum under the law Will take recourse and no drastic action will be taken against it. Applicant's satisfaction when the applicant is satisfied that the applicant's credit card facility should be used to collect the balance due, the applicant said, on the bank's lawyer's assurance, the constitutional application should be referred to the bank's authorized forum. Dealt with by the instructor. Be resolved under civil and criminal jurisdiction

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• ALBERT JOHN v. State 2010 MLD 794
• AACHAR v. State 2010 YLR 794
• TASLEEM AKHTER v. PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 795
• GULZAR AHMED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 800
• DIGITAL WORLD PAKISTAN (PVT.) Ltd. v. SAMSUNG GULF ELECTRONICS FZE through Managing Director 2010 CLD 804
• AZEEM-USH-SHAN-E-HAIDER v. State 2010 PCrLJ 805
• COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, LARGE TAXPAYER UNIT, KARACHI v. PAKISTAN STATE OIL CO. LTD., KARACHI 2010 PTD 808
• ALI ASGHAR v. State 2010 MLD 810

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

famous high court advocate from Kakul lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes