Find a Lawyer

HAZARO versus STATE

Sections 302 (b) and 460 Legal Evidence (10 of 1984), Act 22 Defendant's definition of suspicion of breaking into the morning and night at home The identity parade prosecution case was based solely on the test parade of the identity of the prosecution witnesses. The prosecution of the accused involved in the identification parade was illegal in the commission of such crime without mentioning the role of each of them and had no clear value in the eyes of the prosecution, therefore, they were reasonably beyond the accused. Had failed to prove his crime. The suspects were taken into custody and were acquitted accordingly.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• TAHIR AHMED v. NAEEM IQBAL 2010 PLC(CS) 1233
• Dr. Syed MUHAMMAD ALI SHAH v. CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARD, LAHORE 2010 MLD 1241
• HABIB BANK LTD. v. BELA AUTOMOTIVES LTD. 2010 CLD 1243
• FIRST WOMEN BANK LIMITED through Head of Finance Planning & Operation, Karachi v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LEGAL DIVISION, KARACHI 2010 PTD 1245
• ABDUL QAYOOM v. State 2010 MLD 1251
• ABU DHABI MEDICAL DEVICES CO. L.L.C. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Ministry of Health 2010 CLC 1253
• MUSTAFA ALI KHAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Local Government, Government of Sindh 2010 PLC(CS) 1254
• MUHAMMAD RAHIM SHEIKH v. PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. through Chief Executive Officer 2010 PLC(CS) 1258

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

list of supreme court advocates from Qambar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes