Find a Lawyer

HABIB BANK LTD. versus BELA AUTOMOTIVES LTD.

Amendments to Articles 7 and 10 Civil Code (v. 1908), O VI, Rr 1 and 17 Once the court decides that the amendment is necessary for the purpose of determining the original question, the court shall not, by law, Only permission is required by the party to make an application for it, but it is also obligatory to instruct the amendment, explaining the principles of the said purpose.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• SAEEDUR REHMAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1226
• Mrs. ROHI CHAUDHRY v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad 2010 PTD 1233
• TAHIR AHMED v. NAEEM IQBAL 2010 PLC(CS) 1233
• Dr. Syed MUHAMMAD ALI SHAH v. CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARD, LAHORE 2010 MLD 1241
• FIRST WOMEN BANK LIMITED through Head of Finance Planning & Operation, Karachi v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LEGAL DIVISION, KARACHI 2010 PTD 1245
• HAZARO v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1248
• ABDUL QAYOOM v. State 2010 MLD 1251
• ABU DHABI MEDICAL DEVICES CO. L.L.C. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Ministry of Health 2010 CLC 1253

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

top civil advocates from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes