Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE

Section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 302 Qatil Im Bell, the grant of the incident was in exchange for harsh words between the accused and the complaining party The Special Medical Board stated that the accused was the age of the accused at the time of the incident. Was in constant custody for almost 1 / used / 2 years and no witness was yet examined by the prosecution. I

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Syed SAYEED HAMID v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE 2010 YLR 1629
• ABDUL RAHEEM v. State 2010 MLD 1631
• WAHID BUX alias HAJI WAHID BUX v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1635
• GHULAM MUSTAFA v. SHAH MURAD alias SHAH NAWAZ 2010 MLD 1635
• MEER JANVRI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1646
• SHARIQ SAEED v. MANSOOB ALI KHAN 2010 YLR 1647
• A.R. KHAN & SONS (PVT.) LTD. through Authorized Officer v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad 2010 CLD 1648
• KARACHI SHIPYARD AND ENGINEERING WORKS LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN 2010 PTD 1652

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

famous lower court advocate from Kallur Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes