Further investigation of the FIR grant from Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 404 and 34 of Kital Ahmed revealed that the accused was equipped with a hatchet and together with two unidentified suspects. Had armed people from the country. Made a pistol, caught the complaining party, but did not cause any injury to the complainant or any witness, the accused did not suffer any injury to the victim, though he has been accused of hating and hating What is it. In the FIR, it was attributed to the co-accused who was angry with the accused because the victim involved him in the theft case. Di and the accused went along with their village. The hatchet, but said that the hatchet had not yet been recovered from the possession of the accused, after an unspecified interval of about 16/2 hours, the FIR was lodged. The charge against the accused was naturally normal. Strict liability of the accused can be determined at the hearing; in the circumstances, further investigation is required under section 497 (2), CRPC accused was admitted in bail, under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
