Sections 290, 22 and 305 of the Court of Act (LXIV of 1976), Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 204 The Investigation Auditor of the Court directed the directors of the interim order not to have a general body meeting without its express order. Annual Report by the Company Banning both parties and their attorneys in preventing their shareholders and stock exchanges from carrying out such pending proceedings that the Company's case is strict, and also in every possible way Applicant cannot be found. The relief petitioner requested that the responding publishers declare such a report as biased, which would interfere with justice. Retained respondents neither acted with intent to obstruct justice administration nor scandalized the High Court respondents. No proceedings pending in the High Court were published in violation of a valid action given to the High Court during disobedience or neglect or approval of such restraining order / counsel to the counsel of his client. Can't be called a prejudice: Such opinions / suggestions of the respondents were not hired by the most senior lawyers in the petition and certain respondents did not expect to be considered as a strong case or Provide feedback / advice on the possibility of victory or defeat in any case, which mandates such restriction. Approved, already excluded, the issuance of such a report was a requirement of section 233 of the Companies Ordinance 1984 and was passed by the Stock Exchanges
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
