Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHOAIB versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY LAND UTILIZATION DEPARTMENT

Claims made under Section 42 and Su 54 lawsuit and permanently exempt claimants claimed the right and position in the suit property on the basis of admission in the case, in which the plaintiffs' claim denied them. It was said that the registration was fake and the mock state council has said that interim orders were underway, no action was taken. Authorities will have the freedom to act in a manner that is lawful in performing their public duties. And if this record was fictitious and fake and ad interim orders were in place, they had a duty to apply for his leave in court, which was not always done by the public activists who had taken the matter to court. Was allowed to remain intact. At the time when the authorities investigate and inquire, the applicant does not change the color of the property nor does it create any third party interest.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• ZAINAB GARMENTS (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Housing and Works, Islamabad 2010 PLD 374
• MUHAMMAD UMAR v. UMAR 2010 PCrLJ 376
• KHADIM HUSSAIN SHAH v. State 2010 MLD 377
• SARWAR KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 381
• WAKEELUR REHMAN through L.Rs. v. ABDUL BASIT 2010 CLC 383
• GHULAM RASOOL v. State 2010 PLD 384
• ASAD ALI AWAN v. Mian MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL 2010 YLR 385
• Ch. MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. RENT CONTROLLER NO.IV DISTRICT SOUTH, CITY COURT, KARACHI 2010 MLD 386

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

online advocate from Sara e Naurang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes