ZAINAB GARMENTS (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND WORKS, ISLAMABAD
Arts 189 and 201 decision in the RIM Rule where any challenge to any law, legal principle, etc., is interpreted and decided by the High Courts in one way or the other, then such interpretation, of the law Application, governance, etc. not only decides its right. The person who approached the court but also decided that the High Court and the Supreme Court on the interpretation and application of the law, legal law, etc., applied by the relevant public, legal institutions, authorities, institutions and officials. Decision. It decides the question of law or is based on the principle of law or interpretation / interpretation of the law, legislation etc. is binding not only on all the subordinate courts, tribunals but also on all government and legal workers. ? Such a decision is a good hold and should be. All persons or classes of persons affected by such law, rule, etc., have been requested by all public and legal workers, etc., to permit such person to be repatriated without obtaining or driving them. To be obtained The litigation has already been decided by the High Courts in the first period of litigation in which such person was not a party, unless the court has revised, revised, appealed, or adopted a different opinion. Not authorized.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
