Find a Lawyer

WAKEELUR REHMAN THROUGH L.RS. versus ABDUL BASIT

Sections 42 and 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Axl, R1 Recipient, Pre-requisite Plaintiff's Appointment Claims to Purchase a Flat in Question and Accuses Plaintiff that Its Own Tenants As a result, he demanded an appointment. The property in question in respect of the flat in the recipient's question was never in the possession of the defendant and was always occupied by the plaintiff, either as the owner or the tenant. , Did not accuse of loss or destruction and matters were settled and a commissioner was appointed to record local evidence. The High Court refused to appoint the recipient in connection with the flat. The applications were dismissed in the circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD UMAR v. UMAR 2010 PCrLJ 376
• KHADIM HUSSAIN SHAH v. State 2010 MLD 377
• SARWAR KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 381
• MUHAMMAD SHOAIB v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Land Utilization Department 2010 YLR 383
• GHULAM RASOOL v. State 2010 PLD 384
• ASAD ALI AWAN v. Mian MUHAMMAD SHAKEEL 2010 YLR 385
• Ch. MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. RENT CONTROLLER NO.IV DISTRICT SOUTH, CITY COURT, KARACHI 2010 MLD 386
• APOLLO TEXTILES MILLS LTD. through Chief Financial Officer v. Mian FARHAT IQBAL 2010 CLC 389

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

top advocates from Shorkot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes