Find a Lawyer

MST. NASIM BASHIR versus MUNAWAR PASHA

Section & 42 and Civil 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), jurisdiction to amend Section 115 High Court scope errors and suits filed by the plaintiff in the absence of evidence was decided only to the extent of possession; The plaintiffs had appealed and were dismissed. The Lower Appellate Court's affirmations were all factual questions raised by the plaintiffs, and they failed to identify whether the misrepresentation and the evidence had not been readied by the plaintiff. Which clause of the law can be ignored by the courts below. Do not indicate to the High Court what orders were passed by the following courts in violation of which the High Court refused to interfere with any decision and the order passed by the Lower Appellate Court Was excluded under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD QASIM v. State 2010 YLR 780
• Haji ASGHAR ALI v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ NEREJO 2010 YLR 783
• IQBAL AHMED v. Mst. AZIZ BANO 2010 MLD 784
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 787
• ALBERT JOHN v. State 2010 MLD 794
• AACHAR v. State 2010 YLR 794
• TASLEEM AKHTER v. PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue, Islamabad 2010 PLC(CS) 795
• GULZAR AHMED v. State 2010 PCrLJ 800

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

female advocates from Takhtbai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes