Find a Lawyer

IQBAL AHMED versus MST. AZIZ BANO

Section 2 of the Special Relief Act (the Constitution of 1877), the division of section 454 property into section 2 of the joint immovable property by section 2 of the Act, 1893, has generally ruled that, by such nature, A property when it is unable to be partitioned by Metz. Limitations can be sold and distributed to acquisitions or co-owners so as to resolve the dispute between them as the High Court once directed the court to seize the suit property. And put it away. To auction and distribute sales revenue between auctions and parties according to their respective shares.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• GHULAM RASOOL v. BOARD OF REVENUE SINDH through Member 2010 MLD 776
• MAROOF OIL COMPANY through Authorized Representative v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI 2010 PTD 777
• MUHAMMAD QASIM v. State 2010 YLR 780
• Haji ASGHAR ALI v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ NEREJO 2010 YLR 783
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. State 2010 PCrLJ 787
• Mst. NASIM BASHIR v. MUNAWAR PASHA 2010 YLR 789
• ALBERT JOHN v. State 2010 MLD 794
• AACHAR v. State 2010 YLR 794

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

family advocate from Tall lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes