FEROZUDDIN versus II-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI EAST
Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition discloses the personal need of the landlord to the tenant because the landlord's son used the premises because the landlord neither mentioned his son's name for which The cover was neither necessary nor natural. The business was revealed by Validity Landlord clearly stating that he was an old man and that he was a disabled man with all his sons overseas and he wanted one of his sons to return and to the destroyed premises. Establish a business and take care of it in its twilight years. That the landlord did not disclose his son's name, he was not material and that he did not disclose the nature of the business, his son would start it was not even material landlord was an old man, he was disabled, And it was rational and wrong for an elderly father to wish that his son should come, provide him with livelihood, and then help the father to take the final step toward his grave. The landlord was understandable and it was not mere speculation, it was a real necessity only on the basis that the landlord's sons were in the land of opportunity called the United States and he would not like to return to Pakistan. , Was not enough. High Court refuses to interfere with eviction order passed by lower appellate court against tenants to believe landlord's disqualification
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
