Find a Lawyer

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY THROUGH AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY versus ATCO LABORATORIES (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Temporary injunction by the defendant \ Gemcitabine plaintiff in order to prevent the plaintiff from violating / counterfeiting the Section 60 Civil Code of Conduct (V8 1908), O XXXX, Rr 1 and 2 Application for a restriction is not restricted to the production, marketing and sale of anything. The plaintiff's request for either GEMITA or another trade name in the product containing Gemcita Bine was that it did not have any concern with the process used by the claimant to manufacture Gemstein. That its product was unique and unique and had nothing to do with the plaintiff's manufacturing process. The chemical formula, the experimental formula was different from the defendants Gemcitabine justification. Such a contentious question of facts cannot be resolved without recording the evidence of the parties.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• P & G INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE v. ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, (APPRAISEMENT GR-II), KARACHI 2010 PTD 870
• AZMAT KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 872
• FEROZUDDIN v. II-ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KARACHI EAST 2010 YLR 874
• MEHTAB AHMED v. CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU, KARACHI 2010 PLC(CS) 876
• Master GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 MLD 877
• SHAHEEN FREIGHTS SERVICES through Proprietor v. EBRAHIM TRUST through Managing Trustee 2010 CLC 878
• HADI BUX v. State 2010 MLD 885
• RIZWAN HANIF v. State 2010 YLR 888

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

famous supreme court advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes