Continuing Sections 90, 200 and 204 and the Prosecutor's Private Complaint, the Complainant claimed that the trial court was bound to issue a warrant in a private complaint, and in doing so violated the procedure. Was. Section 204, the CCP adopted the correct procedure because the court needed the court to proceed with the proceedings, if it were of the opinion that sufficient material was available against the accused for section 204 of the case, the CRPC The court was further authorized that even in non-bailable offenses, the proceedings could be issued in the first place, unless the court was of the opinion that proceedings could defeat the proceedings through deportation. The provisions are further strengthened by the provisions of section 90, CRPC, which gave the court the power to re-apply at its discretion. ; And, if the court was of the opinion that the proceeding could defeat the proceedings, after the court had recorded the reasons, the applicant / complainant's complaint would be alien to the provisions of Sections 90 and 204 of the PC Criminal Code. Can Advancing justice and the terms provided in it were not compulsory in nature, but it was a directive because no punishment for non-compliance was provided in which the trial court's procedure was, in the circumstances, appropriate. And there was no injustice done to the applicant. Dismiss
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
