Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHADIM HUSSAIN versus STATE


Section 497 Narcotic Substance Control (XXV of 1997), intoxicants guaranteed to sections 6 and 9, in the absence of any document in the record denying the challan of the case, cannot be agreed upon nor It may be agreed with the prosecution that it was the accused who was delaying the trial proceedings under Section 9 (c) of the Controlled Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997, which was 1000 grams, while the quantity recovered in this case was 1500 grams. Which is more than 50% of the threshold amount, it would not be appropriate. Normally more trials have found that the provisions of Section 103, CCPC, deal with drugs. Atta was not attracted to, as was provided under Section 25 of the Drugs Act 1997, except that, when an independent person was not ready to be a witness, it would be difficult to conclude that he was The anonymity would be upsetting because the offenses against the accused took place under Section 497, CRPC under the prohibited degree. , The accused's request for bail was rejected

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Takhtbai lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.