The complainant acted in his dual capacity as complainant and investigating officer in this case, as was the owner of the Section 9 (c) drug, while the prosecution's witness was subordinate to the two co-accused. He was acquitted by the same court. Judging by the irrefutable evidence of the complainant and the witnesses against him, his position remains intact as no appeal was filed against Baret by the department, the Special Public Prosecutor alleged. Was gone, but no material points were collected by the prosecution through cross examination. Evidence of the defendant's testimony from the defendant also supported the defendant's version of his alleged accusations by the complainant, the defendant tried to establish his innocence, but the trial court defended the defendant. The request was not considered and was declared an accused. Despite being accused by the complainant of false accusations with which the accused argued, his sentence could not be sustained and was set aside.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
