Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The Constitutional Appeal for the Recovery of Articles of the Dowry, the Family Court stated in its judgment that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover the articles related to the dowry, and the Appellate Court had granted the family. The court had upheld the decision. The constitutional petition was influenced by the plaintiff; no documentary evidence was brought on record by the defendant to prove his claim in relation to the dowry / other articles. In his examination only, he stated in the Chief's statement that there were 62 articles lying in the defendant's flat and the defendant withdrew his passport. It was stated that the articles were not provided by the plaintiff and not. The same documentary evidence was brought to the record. The dowry or other articles are not in the record for the judgment of the plaintiff filed before the Family Court; it was not correct for the plaintiff to claim that the material evidence was disregarded by the evidence on record. It turns out that the results filed by the Family Court were present. According to the evidence neither the jurisdiction of the court was challenged, nor the proceedings were brought down by the courts below, no unlawful interference was found in the concurrent concurrent decisions of the following courts, in the constitutional jurisdiction. Cannot be interrupted Of the High Court
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
