Find a Lawyer

AIJAZ MEHMOOD versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Section 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition for the determination of the recipient / tenant of fair rent was submitted that the person who initiated legal proceedings against him is not authorized to initiate legal proceedings. Was. And the power of attorney to be executed in his favor was not based on the approval of any resolution of the bank / company board of directors. The petitioner submitted that at least two persons should have acted as lawyers. The Articles of Association were authorized by any of the officers of the company, then in the present case the company did not need any solution because the power of attorney was a member of the bank / executive board of the company, he had the article of association. There was no need for a separate resolution for the appointment of a solicitor on behalf of the bank / company. The requirement was that at least two people should act as lawyers, admitting that the bank / company's The two officers signed a fair hire. Appeal to the rent controller There is no legal impediment in this regard; in the event legal proceedings were initiated by company (bank) officers. Worked on a Power of Attorney basis

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. SANAULLAH WOOLLEN MILLS LTD. 2010 PTD 278
• ADAMJEE INSURA?TCE COMPANY LTD. through Managing Director v. CAR CHASE through Partner 2010 CLD 280
• GADAL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 280
• BLOCH KHAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Local Government, Karachi 2010 YLR 281
• YAR MUHAMMAD v. RAFIQUE 2010 MLD 286
• MUSTAQEEM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 286
• Syed TANVEER ABBAS ZAIDI v. VIIITH FAMILY JUDGE AND JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE EAST, KARACHI 2010 YLR 288
• ZEERAN GUL alias ZAREEN GUL v. State 2010 PLD 291

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

pakistani advocates Trinda Mohd Pannah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes