Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD KHAN versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL AGRICULTURE (WATER MANAGEMENT) PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 199 Constitutional Request To prevent the payment of civil service transfers, the applicant contacted the concerned department to issue the expiring certificate so that he could join his next post while applying for an illegal absence from duty. An inquiry was initiated against the petitioner till such certificate was issued, it would not be possible for the M to receive his salary, even though the applicant had joined the new pay-for-work certificate. And the applicant's termination report was not released, resulting in D Application was not very correct salary. There was a lawful reason for withholding the last pay certificate and the pending inquiry against the applicant for removal of the application has been stated at length, which could not provide a reason for the department to withhold the applicant's salary, The High Court has directed the department to issue the final pay certificate and report on the applicant within the specified period.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUSHTAQ AHMAD v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary Industries, Lahore 2010 PLC(CS) 68
• MUHAMMAD YOUNUS v. DIVISIONAL CANAL OFFICER, LODHRAN CANAL DIVISION, MULTAN 2010 CLC 68
• UMAR AHMAD v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BUREWALA, DISTRICT VEHARI 2010 MLD 68
• Mian MUHAMMAD TARIQ v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law 2010 PLD 70
• Sheikh FAROOQ AFTAB v. PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION through Chairman 2010 YLR 74
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. MUHAMMAD SHARIF 2010 CLC 77
• HABIB BANK LTD. through its Attorneys v. ZAFAR IQBAL 2010 PLC 78
• Mian MUHAMMAD NAWAZ SHARIF v. State 2010 PLD 81

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

when you need a advocate from Hub Chowki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes