O XVII, R 3 Despite obtaining more than nine consecutive delays and putting the burden of pending costs on and giving him a warning, final and final opportunity on six different occasions, the trial court's pending evidence, the trial court Retained appellate court affirmation that the plaintiff's duty was to present evidence because the suit for recording of the plaintiff's evidence had been under trial for more than three years, hearing the trial. At the last date, the trial could not be postponed indefinitely. Submit evidence on the relevant date, otherwise the right to present evidence will be waived; the trial court closed the evidence of the plaintiff on the relevant date after waiting for the trial till 2 o'clock. The reason for the further pending approval was not disclosed. The trial court on the basis of the material available by the trial court dismissed the review petition in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
