AYESHA SABOHI versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE
R13 (iii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The theory of suspension ratio removed from the constitutional application training course was the applicant probationer assistant sub inspector and was sent to the training but without his two-day leave. Because of that he was released. Commandant suspended by the Training and Commandant Training School did not have the authority to remove the applicant from the training. Applicants could not afford a hearing or reason to explain their position. Commandant proceeded on the idea that The applicant was not interested in training and had demonstrated intentional absence. Which of these facts was irrelevant and beyond the scope of the concept, the applicant's commandant was the Capital City Police Officer of the competent authority as shown in his appointment letter, therefore, the commandant had the applicant There was no suspension option, the applicant arrived with support only two days late. The reason was thrown out over a year-long e-start at the beginning of his career, as soon as the commandant has been given the option to eliminate the inadvertent and non-controversial applicant error, Therefore, the order passed by the Commandant without the legal authority and without legal effect, the High Court directed the Commandant to take the applicant back to the course. The petition was allowed accordingly.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
