MUHAMMAD SHARIF NAZ versus GOVERNOR, STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN
Regulations 17 (i) and 18 (iii) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 25 and 199 Constitutional application for voluntary retirement from employment in September 2006 Approval of inflation allowance by the bank at the rate of 17% of monthly monetized salary. Receipt of retirement liabilities (including all allowances) by applicants on a salary basis based on the salary earned by each employee as a separate allowance for the year 2006, which is not accounted for in pension benefits. A 20% increase from June 1, 2006, for applicants of such inflation allowances, including retirement liabilities for supplemental allowance integration into paid salaries and accordingly, their period of retirement allowance after retirement grants. Claims were not objected to for the arbitration. 20% of the existing salary will be used as the basis for calculation of pension, garnishment, provident, etc. According to Article 25 of the Constitution, all persons are kept equally ie one Applicants belonging to the same group or belonging to the same group will be entitled to equal treatment with the applicants. After disconnecting with the bank, a different class is formed in the competition. Applicants were not discriminated Applicants did not disclose the recent increase in their pensions, so to this extent they did not approach the court with a clear hand on the employer's right to provide additional benefits / privileges. No restrictions can be imposed. Applicants for their existing employees refrained from their approach to claiming integration
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010