PIL COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE/DIRECTOR versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JDUGE, LAHROE
A IX, R 13 and O XXXVII, Rr 1, 2 For the pre-emption, keeping the conditional leave of the defense condition, non-compliance with the condition, the trial court granted leave to defend the bank guarantee case , But the defendants failed to comply. Conditional and absent, the result was that the ex parte decree was issued against him, a period of thirty days beyond which the petition for removal of the ex parte order was filed, which was denied by the trial court by limitation. Declared, dismissed, Plaintiff's request to set aside the order under O IX, a time restriction on R 13 CPC, a trial court-approved decree invalid or irregular Notwithstanding, in the exercise of the jurisdiction of the appeal, the trial court's order refused to interfere, the appeal was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
