MST. RAHMAT versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-II, MUZAFFARGARH
Sections 10 (4) and 14 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Plaintiffs / Wives Sue to dissolve Marriage on the grounds of Physical Abuse by Husband / Defendant, Former Part Trial Court Married Dissolved Khola and the plaintiff's land were directed to file 4 kanal land under "Revenge e Khola" as well as a restitution allowance for the duration of the adjudicator, which was dismissed by the appellate court, by the plaintiff. The argument raised was that he did not file. The case for dissolution of marriage on the Khulla land in which the plaintiff further claimed that the disputed land was not given as part of the Dwyer, but as part of the settlement in the earlier restoration case given on the basis of oppression. Prove why her own witness was not deposed in her favor The marriage dissolved on Khulna's land \ The record reveals that the disputed land was transferred to the PLA to take advantage of the settlement of the law in a court. The rehabilitation allowance granted to the plaintiff not too long after the marriage did not fall under the purview of the Haqqani as the West Pakistan Family Ada. Section 10 (4) of the Addiction Act is provided for. , Against the order of the trial court High Court, the appeal of 1964 under section 14 (2) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, was not admissible, the constitutional petition filed against the trial court order and referred to The order was invalid, keeping the same to the extent of the return of 4 kanal land, the High Court had also set aside the order for the withdrawal of the restitution allowance granted by the material irregularities and the appellate court. al r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
