MST. SEEMA HASSAN versus DISTRICT JUDGE RAWALPINDI
Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for retrieval of Dover money, restitution allowance, dissolution of marriage articles and suit for marriage, case of dissolution of marriage on the basis of this But the family court ordered. The plaintiff's statement in which she held that she hated her husband's suit for the recovery of articles related to dowry was dismissed by the Family Court suit to the extent of the recovery of the passport, but the plaintiff was also declared a plaintiff. Was granted, however, he was entitled to the restoration of the period of Rs. 2000 monthly and the minor was entitled to a monthly recovery of Rs 2000 from the date of dismissal unless the appellate court legally recovered Dover. , Upheld the Family Court's order regarding the recovery of gold jewelry and the recovery of personal property. The family court observed in connection with the recovery of the goods, however, was changed and the plaintiff was allowed to recover only Rs. 5000 for a period of time and the minor was allowed to recover Rs. 3000 monthly as long as he was legally. But the same claim did not hold that both the courts below did not err on all the points of minor rehabilitation, however, the result was largely unsuccessful that subject the minor to an annual increase of 10%. Should go up as the needs of children increase over time. It is important that rehabilitation provided to underage children be increased on an annual basis and part of the final decision to end litigation. The amendment was made and it was stated that the plaintiff was entitled to rehabilitation from the 15th 2001 to the adjournment period.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
