Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus MST. ABIDA BIBI

Section 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition for the Recovery of Gold Jewelry - As Barry, Zarkhal Scope Plaintiff filed a claim against the Plaintiff for the recovery of 4 Weight Gold Jewelry. It was reported that the marriage was dissolved on the basis of marriage. And the defendant was obliged to return the jewelry given to her as jewelry on twelve occasions. Val Berry normal was generally regarded as a gift given to the bride at the wedding and, in turn, the parents' parents. Brides usually spend a lot of money to buy gifts for each close relative of the bride. These gifts come in the realm. Gifts were not something that could be exported under the amalgamation of Islam. Did not come in the circle. E Khola Once the groom admitted that the gold jewelry was a gift, he could not claim the same gift or even came under Habib Balwaz because there was no mention of it in the High Court. Was refused to interfere in the final outcome of the trial and the appellate court's constitutional application was dismissed within limits \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• TARIQ AHMAD v. RAFIA TABASSUM 2010 YLR 347
• TARIQ MEHMOOD v. Mst. FARAH SHAHEEN 2010 YLR 349
• RAHM DAD v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, FAUJI FOUNDATION, RAWALPINDI CANTT. 2010 PLD 349
• MANZOOR AHMAD v. GHULAM NABI 2010 CLC 350
• MUHAMMAD LATIF v. BOARD OF REVENUE through Senior Member (Revenue) Punjab, Lahore 2010 YLR 353
• A. REHMAN MALIK v. State 2010 PLD 353
• ALI KULI KHAN KHATTAK, CHAIRMAN, GENERAL TYRE & RUBBER COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LTD. KARACHI v. APPELLATE BENCH No.II, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2010 CLD 355
• ALI RAZA v. CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION, LAHORE 2010 YLR 356

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

advocates from Liaquat Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes