MUHAMMAD LATIF versus BOARD OF REVENUE THROUGH SENIOR MEMBER (REVENUE) PUNJAB, LAHORE
17, 18 and 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Appointment of Respondents Respondents requested the collector that there were two approved posts of the limber holder in the relevant check but only one, namely, the applicant by the second applicant as a limber holder. Was working from The capacity of the district slab lumberman allowed the second lumberman to fill the office and send it to the file assistant commissioner. The second applicant submitted a review request stating that approval of the second position required the approval of the commissioner under the law, under which the collector reviewed his first order. He allowed the second lumberman appeal filed by the defendant against the collector's order under which he had reviewed his first order. The commissioner rejected saying that the lumberman was merely There was only one post against which the applicant was acting as respondent. Request for review before Se Noir, the Board of Revenue, who ordered the suspension of the order, the matter before the Senior Member to be remanded to the Collector by means of certain observations, relating to the second position of the Board of Revenue Lumber. , Which was claimed by the respondent and nothing about the applicant's disqualification. Taking charge of the lumber was the Member, Board of Revenue before him, in view of the circumstances, before the Collector and Commissioner approved the proper orders and the Member, the Member of the Board of Revenue, resented the order passed by the Board. Had no jurisdiction Review Revenue and approve a later review request
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
