Sections 230 (b) (c) and 4 324, were involved in the murder and attempt to appraise the evidence.The conviction, the reduction in the motivation of the incident was fully established on the record, it was alleged that the accused raised the complaint. He said that after the incident, the complaining party went to the accused's residence where the incident took place. During that period, the complaining party opened fire on the accused's residence and injured the father of the accused. The accused then filed a case to rescue him. The father opened fire indiscriminately, leaving the victim and two others injured. Exceeded Q. He should not have been accused of indiscriminate prosecution, under the circumstances, section 2302 (b), did not fall within the scope of the PPC, but should be prosecuted under section 2302 (c). The PPC was the cause of the death and injury of the accused. Complainant complained about the mother's injury to the mother of the accused, unable to depend. Under the circumstances, the accused was found to be in Section 22c (c). Could be punished under the sentence, the accused was not justified in the death sentence and was reduced to 10 years imprisonment by the trial court-appointed compensation amount. The accused was also fined Rs 50,000 for attempting to kill the complainant's mother. Section 382B is the beneficiary of the CRPC and the reference was answered in the negative
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
