MUHAMMAD NADEEM versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH HOME SECRETARY
Sections 3, 23, 24, 25 and 26 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petitioner challenged his brother's arrest and detention order for a period of 30 days which was approved by the District Coordination Officer in practice. Was given The powers granted under section 3 of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, held that the law (the relevant section of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960) issued the authority to satisfy the constitutional provisions and, Imposes heavy responsibility on the arrest. Before such material could be impacted the person was acting in a manner that was prejudicial to the protection of the public or the restoration of public order. Simple registration of false, fraudulent, fictitious events within one month in a police station in the relevant district could not prove to be a good place to issue a detention order. The applicant further stated that the legislature's intention was to issue a detention order. The authority to make up its mind on the facts and material laid before it, on the basis of the issuance of sections 23, 24 and 25 of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, was not found in accordance with the fundamental rights touchstone. Administered and guaranteed by the Constitution, the provisions of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960, however, violate the basic rights guaranteed under the Constitution, but under section 28 of the said ordinance, the protection of the public And a balanced order has been revealed. Various provinces and states, which nevertheless showed that the legislature wishes to appellate the presence of the West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order Ordinance, 1960
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
