Section 4 32 ???? Evidence was appreciated in an attempt to commit murder, as well as the trial court and the appellate court convicted and sentenced, those who appeared as witnesses were acquitted against the accused. Was. He clearly pointed the finger at the accused as he stated in his statement to the police under Section 161, CRPC medical evidence revealed that the FIRs contained the injuries. Presence was created by a doctor who medically examined the wounds. And the police officers who investigated had no enmity that in order to falsely implicate them in a matter of this nature, the following two courts had to review and review the evidence before reaching the conclusion of the Judicial Magistrate. After the disapproval decisions were approved. The courts below were such that each court could come to the same conclusion after a fair review of the evidence on record, that no basis for setting aside the minor contradiction in the prosecution's evidence and acquitting the accused. Otherwise any judicial weakness, illegal approach, procedural irregularities or defect of negligence was identified by the NGO's lawyer so as to interfere with the unclean decisions passed against him in this case. Go High from which the High Court rejected the review. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010