Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKBAR ABBAS versus MUHAMMAD ZAFAR

A. XXXVII, Rr. 2 and 3. The scope of the extension of the guarantee of suit guarantees for the receipt of money has been filed by the plaintiff on the basis of the check issued by the plaintiff. Applied for leave to appear and defend the case, which was granted under the condition that he be guaranteed an equal amount of money within two weeks. The plaintiff sought an extension of time to provide a bail bond. Permission granted by the plaintiff that the extension of time was not sufficient to provide bail and the defendant was not entitled to arbitrary relief: the trial court erred This was taken into account in the old age, the distance from the court premises to its residence and the lack of proximity to the city. The court was located, the extension time for the submission of the surety bond was used after the weighing and balancing by the parties' speculation and judicial application of the mind which would not be declared arbitrary or unrealistic by any imagination. ?

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. PUNJAB COOPERATIVES BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION through Chairman 2010 CLC 684
• AMJID ALI v. State 2010 MLD 685
• RAHIM BAKHSH v. State 2010 PCrLJ 688
• UMAR HAYAT v. State 2010 YLR 689
• TALLAT MAHBOOB v. SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPE LINES LTD. Through General Manager, Distribution Officer, Sargodha Road, Faisa 2010 MLD 690
• Mst. SALEEMA BIBI v. KHAIR MUHAMMAD 2010 YLR 691
• Syed MUHAMMAD SARWAR ALI SHAH v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHROTIY, MULTAN 2010 CLC 691
• Mian KASHIF MAHMOOD-UL-HASSAN v. JUDGE FAMILY COURT, KAROR 2010 MLD 692

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

Pakistan, top advocate family court from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes