Find a Lawyer

MIAN KASHIF MAHMOOD-UL-HASSAN versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, KAROR

Article 5 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Applicants for the dismissal effect of the formation of appropriate matters, filed a dissolution of the marriage and restitution allowance and filed before the trial court to decide the appropriate cases. The order affecting the defendant's legal status was interim in nature and does not reflect the nature of the final decision of the dispute. The High Court refused to interfere with the constitutional jurisdiction. The constitutional petition was dismissed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD AKBAR ABBAS v. MUHAMMAD ZAFAR 2010 CLC 689
• TALLAT MAHBOOB v. SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPE LINES LTD. Through General Manager, Distribution Officer, Sargodha Road, Faisa 2010 MLD 690
• Mst. SALEEMA BIBI v. KHAIR MUHAMMAD 2010 YLR 691
• Syed MUHAMMAD SARWAR ALI SHAH v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHROTIY, MULTAN 2010 CLC 691
• RAFI AHMED v. SPECIAL JUDGE, CENTRAL, LAHORE 2010 PLD 692
• BABAR v. State 2010 YLR 694
• SHAYAN through Mst. Shamim alias Shama v. NISAR AHMAD alias BAGGA 2010 MLD 695
• MUHAMMAD AJMAL KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Schools Education, Lahore 2010 PLC(CS) 695

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

top civil advocates from Peshawar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes