SHAYAN THROUGH MST. SHAMIM ALIAS SHAMA versus NISAR AHMAD ALIAS BAGGA
Article 5 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Impact of Dismissal of Daughter Refusal Effect Plaintiff / Daughter filed a restitution case against her father on the basis that her father did not maintain it And claimed the past as well as the future. The father claimed to take care of Rs 6,000 a month on the basis that he divorced the mother of the plaintiff before a panchayat in 1994 and found that he had paid Rs 175,000 to the mother. Should pay. The plaintiff and the mother will not claim to care for their daughter and the same trial court had executed the divorce, agreement and receipt and the trial will be held at the rate of Rs 3000 per month from the date of the appellate institution. The court, on appeal, reduced the restoration from Rs 3000 to Rs 2000 and in the 1999 constitutional petition from the previous restoration, the High Court obtained the remand of the case. The next trial court for the trial court's decision once again appealed to the plaintiff. The judgment of the case was pronounced and maintained from the date of the Appellate Court on the maintenance and subsequent maintenance appeals filed at the rate of Rs 2000 per month from 1999 to 1999, from 2000 to 2000, both the parties appealed to the defendant. Allowed and denied the pastoral care claim and the appeal filed by the plaintiff, which was retained by his father Illegal right / The plaintiff / daughter is entitled to receive her father's care till her marriage; she was entitled to receive care at a rate of Rs 2000 per month which was fair and reasonable and according to the past restoration. His High Court had claimed that the past was restored
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
