MUHAMMAD SHAHID MAQBOOL BHATTI versus SAJID HUSSAIN
Section 202020/8 468/111 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 998), Article 61 A61 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the FIR Petition for Applicants as Fraudulent, Fraudulent and Genuine Fake Documents The termination, allegedly used after receiving the stamp paper, showed the false execution agreement allegedly executed by the complainant / respondents. Neither was it recovered from the applicant's possession but no mention was made on the record as to how and why the copy of the statement was obtained by the investigating officer as no recovery memo was attached to the file. Was told the document was never sent to anyone. Neither the handwriting expert nor any information was sought whether the applicant had ever signed the document that the applicant allegedly stamped on the thumb, but did not see the impression of the thumb. And there was no comparison. None of the Investigation Officers has ever attempted to compare the thumb impression on the alleged document FIR and the subsequent inquiry into the matter, based on the report under Section 173, invalidated the procedure of the Judicial Magistrate. And was declared an abuse, CRPC charged the applicant under the section. 468/471/506, the PPC allegations made in the FIR, were self-contained and the alleged record was a photostatic copy of the document, which was not in such a case that it had some external influence on the investigating officer. Can be relied upon as ideas. The report appears to have been prepared under section 173, CR PC
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
