SYED IMDAD HUSSAIN SHAH versus SYED MAKHDOOM HUSSAIN RAZA
The plaintiff's opinion was also dismissed by the Appellate Court against the decision and order of the trial trial for section 12 registration act (XVI of 1908), section 49 and 60 contract that the sale agreement for all purposes was a registered one. Was documented and had a strict presumption of accuracy under section 49 read with Section 60 of the Registration Act. 1908 and unless there was strong evidence on record to disprove this speculation, the said document should occupy this field and be considered valid for all purposes, even though it is a registered document, and the heavy burden on the plaintiff. Have to There was ctity in the document that was registered in the document to prove the authenticity of the transaction and to prove the authenticity of the said transaction, and strong evidence was needed to challenge the fact of the said instrument. There was no evidence on record to deny the fact of this transaction but one thing that was very relevant was that the defendant was a predatory woman in the interest of the defendant and in the case of the Pardashian woman, the court cautioned And caution should be exercised, the evidence on record was deemed inadequate. The interest of justice was demanded that in view of the plea from the defendants that they had a vested interest and had never been presented before, proof of sub-registrar, sub-registrar and author was required by the High Court. Accepted the application and received a case remand accordingly
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
