Section 2 (2 (b) / Q 34): Defending AMD evidence, the defense plea taken by the accused in order to save his life in order to save his life was neither appealed for argument nor timely filed. The FIR made full details of the incident. The matter of the presence of witnesses at the time of the inquiry report incident was quite natural. There was no question as to the suspect's misidentification as the incident occurred during the day and The accused was closely related to the complainant that the ocular evidence was in accordance with all material and related aspects. The witness of the accused cannot be declared a witness. As the complainant's original concealment, his chances of being trapped and replaced are very rare. The main accused opened fire on the victim's chest. What was, with the help of medical evidence and his conviction retained, the accused was also injured in the incident when there was no serious rivalry between the deceased and the accused, the motive was not proved by the prosecution and The exact cause of the incident is not known, the death sentence of the accused has been changed to life imprisonment.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
