MUHAMMAD ZIA-UR-REHMAN versus S.H.O., POLICE STATION ACE, KHANEWAL
Section 199 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409 Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Violation of criminal trust by public servants; Created under, he was a "juridical person" and his members and workers did not come under the definition of "civil servant", without any jurisdiction to initiate an investigation against them under anti-corruption laws. The wires; and the FI rupees listed against them were illegal. If done, the people associated with the payment of their duties using public funds would be public servants, though they could not be civil servants or the government was remunerated to receive their salaries / compensation. Because the money being spent by the applicant's officials is out of public funds and it was considered to be spent for public purposes if it was said that the money was used illegally, it did not say. Can't prosecute applicants under Anti-Corruption Rules: Board Constitutional petitions were not filed by the KGB officials, but were filed by them. Board officials may not allow Board Relief (applicant) in the absence of a suitable request from them. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
