Find a Lawyer

RAJA MUHAMMAD MUNIR versus MIAN MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Article 204 Defamation Court Act (LXIV of 1976), the alleged claimants of Sections 3 and 4, appeared in person and sought unconditional apology on their behalf as well as on behalf of two other persons. Was. The petitions submitted by the Senior Special Judge regarding the comment of the Senior Special Judge, Anti-Corruption have shown that in view of the unconditional pardon by the alleged claimants, the court has asked the court to move the High Court in this case. Rejected idea, felt satisfied. With unconditional apology by the terms, and thus no further action is demanded in this regard

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• NAZIA BIBI v. ISHTIAQ MASIH 2010 YLR 1765
• AF INDUSTRIES through Proprietor v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Law 2010 CLD 1765
• ALLAH DAD v. FAZAL HAQ 2010 YLR 1766
• MUHAMMAD MADNI v. State 2010 MLD 1768
• MUHAMMAD ZIA-UR-REHMAN v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION ACE, KHANEWAL 2010 MLD 1770
• MUHAMMAD SHAUKAT v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1775
• MUHAMMAD NOSHAD v. State 2010 YLR 1780
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1782

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

property advocate from Kallat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes