MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus AHL-E-ISLAM THROUGH TAHIR MEHMOOD
OI, R 8 The plaintiffs sued in representative capacity on the basis that the mosque on the disputed property was gifted by the owner of the said property and the defendants intended to demolish the mosque. But then the former Parliamentary Trial Court ruled that the appellate court of the plaintiffs, on appeal, rejected the same defendants as having obtained no court permission under the OI, R8, CPC in the representative suit. Had not been obtained by the plaintiff, nor any report, by the plaintiff, on the merits of representation. The High Court was available on the plea of the public about beating the drum and other methods of service, they set aside the decisions of the two courts and made the appropriate application in the terms of the OI, R8. After granting permission, the case remanded for re-adjudication. The CPC, the trial court, will issue a declaration inviting objections to the local newspaper and then the decision of the High Court. Directed that if this mosque was built on a disputed site, it should not be demolished or taken over by the defendants, and further directed the trial court to issue four months from the receipt of the present order. Decide the case inside.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
