Article 199 The principle of the difference between the use of the constitutional application land, `facilities of and` requirements of, has been gifted to the provincial government exclusively in the question of construction of the school, no such school was built on it. ? The land in question and, instead, the provincial government began to transfer the land to other departments. Authorities had demanded that the government departments be efficient because they were providing facilities to the people. Lying for any useful purpose, a land that cannot be used for any other purpose, if such land will not be used practically for decades or even centuries, then the next generation of open space, Once lost, it cannot be re-created. It was like a page of history, once it was broken, it could not be changed if the authorities were allowed to exploit the land in question, the good purpose of the gift and the emotions that people had. When forced to separate from their land for such a sacred purpose, they will die forever, neither a new land can be formed, nor can the dead spirit of sacrifice be resurrected. Provided only some facilities to the people but freedom, resurrection and the upliftment of the society were rooted in the need for convenience today. Can and should be given. Since the practice of seizing gifted land for a specific purpose was illegal, no interval was established at any intervals.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
