The effect of the absence of litigation to approve the Declaration of Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the mother of the mother filed a lawsuit to deny the impression that he was the owner of the disputed property. And inherited them. Through an inheritance by his father, the trial court claimed in favor of the plaintiffs that the appellate court had dismissed the plaintiff's mother, the plaintiff's mother claiming that he had inherited the disputed property. Part, on which defendants alleged that defendants were donated by him, was illegal, fraudulent and unlawful was the result of their rights to be a legal representative of the plaintiff. Due to the interest I was standing in the shoes of my predecessor. The plaintiff's witness testified in several tests that the plaintiff's mother was. None of the mutations were present when the same was approved but it was shown that he was already at the time of the second altercation Defendants failed to present evidence to the person who allegedly / Rupert, who hanged, identified Waketty's mother and indicated that no donor's signature or thumb mark or identity or testimony were present. In order to establish the facts of the gift, a Revenue Officer was presented below. Both the courts had concluded that the plaintiff's mother had not voluntarily gifted the disputed property through a disputed motion. Declined \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
